The spiraling
economy as a whole is on everyone’s mind. The problem for the candidates in
this case is how individual states are viewing the issue. If economic problems
are more noticeable in a certain area then they might decide it’s time for
change. For Obama this means proving that he can get us out of some of this mess
as he promised in 2008. For Romney it means focusing and convincing the more
populated areas that Obama didn’t do his job; he just added to the problem. People are seeing a decline in jobs and rise in
debt, so Romney has the easier job of pointing out the failures instead of
acknowledging the progress that was made in the last four years, and what
progress can be made under the same administration.
Answers to questions
about bias in the media
Bias in the media
sometimes is so subtle that it’s too hard to detect. In some cases though it’s
quite clear what side the author is on.
For citizens to be informed
about their government they have to pay attention to the news, watch the
conventions, or they can look up what they want to know online (ex. Google what
each party believes in). The thing is that no website will give you 100% fact
and absolutely no bias. You have to be aware of bias and be able to separate facts
from opinions
No comments:
Post a Comment